Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, the > > JDK Version 1.1.x Internal Noncommercial Use Source License1 of 4 > Nov 10, 1998 > > which I have signed states, in part
[...] Thanks for the information, this clears up a lot. > Therefore, such binaries as I produce may be legitimately distributed > in non-free, as they have been for some time. If you would prefer to > have the source licence added to the package, I'm happy to do that. Definitely -- all license information should be in the copyright file. However, I see this clause: (i) Derived Binaries are not integrated, bundled, combined or associated in any way with a product, Is the placement in a Debian distribution not at least one of "integrated, bundled, combined or associated"? Richard Braakman
