"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote: > May I point out the existance of FLTK?
You may. I did also in my post. > It _was_ XForms compatible, but my > understanding is it's not anymore. In any case, FLTK should be _similar_ to > XForms, and in _theory_ it shouldn't be that hard to substitute XForms code > with FLTK code. FLTK is LGPL. I tried with one of my packages and got nowhere. Unfortunately, I don't even code for XForms, I just packaged stuff I used, so I'm not the best suited to do the port. This port excercise was done for pcmcia-cs, and I promised myself to take the time to see what was involved (looks non-trivial). The job might be trivial for someone who eally knows what they are doing, and I for one would love to see the end result. Perhaps I should post such a request for help on -devel, but that is beside the point anyway. We need a good add-on clause for the GPL. Thanks, Peter
