Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > How about: > > > > "You may link this software with XForms (Copyright (C) by > > T.C. Zhao and Mark Overmars) and distribute the resulting > > binary, under the restrictions in clause 3 of the GPL, even > > though the resulting binary is not, as a whole, covered by > > the GPL. (You still need a separate license to do so from the > > owner(s) of the copyright for XForms, however). If a > > derivative no longer requires XForms, you may use the > > unsupplemented GPL as its license by deleting this paragraph > > and therefore removing this exemption for XForms. > > > > Too wordy? > > Thanks to all of you! > > Since there were no comments on this, can I consider the above > satisfactory?
Indeed. I can find no holes in it, even with nitpick mode set to "ultra" :) Richard Braakman
