On 21 Jun 1999, Henning Makholm wrote: > But your proposed rephasing seems less than ideal - it sounds as if > you are giving a guarantee that the XForms people will never change > their minds about future libraries they choose to call XForms (and, > for that matter, that the license file you've looked at was not > faked).
Got it. How about "You still need a separate licence to do so from the
owner(s) of the copyright for XForms, see the XForms copyright."?
- Tom
