Jim Pick writes: > Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 07:16:08PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote: > > > > > Before you do that, I seem to remember that the license for ILU had been > > > cleared up a couple of months ago. Looking at > > > ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/ilu/ilu.html > > > I can't see why it shouldn't go in main. > > > > Quoting /usr/doc/ilu/copyright: > > > > Any distribution of this software, a modified version thereof, or a > > derivative work must comply with all applicable United States export > > control laws. > > So? We have to comply with US export laws anyways. If somebody else > wants to break those laws, it doesn't come back at us - they just lose > their right to use/distribute the software. > > > We can't ensure this so this has to go into non-free :( > > > > Silly lawyers. > > It should go back into main.
No, because it depends on jdk1.1-dev, which is in contrib. So please keep it in contrib until it can be compiled with another java (gcj/libgcj, kaffe, ...)
