Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not meant as an argument that IPL is not DFSG-compiant, is it?
Correct: it's not that sort of argument. -- Raul
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not meant as an argument that IPL is not DFSG-compiant, is it?
Correct: it's not that sort of argument. -- Raul