Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (scrawling on the screen of my Palm-Pilot) > > You could make it GPL compatible. The quoted clause applies to > parallel contributors and does not prevent subsequent contributors > from continuing to honor your license.
I don't see where the license makes that kind of distinction. Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [Please Cc me, I'm not subscribed.] > >> >> This is the new Postfix license. Is it GPL-compatible? > > > >I don't think so. > > > >> A Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form > >> under its own license agreement, provided that: > >> a) it complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and > >> b) its license agreement: > >.... > >> iii) states that any provisions which differ from this Agreement > >> are offered by that Contributor alone and not by any other > >> party; and > > > >This makes it not compatible with the GPL, since the GPL requires that > >the terms you distribute it under apply to all third parties, while > >this IBM license does not.
