Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Henning Makholm wrote:
> > It spells this out loud and clear: > > | When the Program is made available in source code form: > > | a) it must be made available under this Agreement; and > > | b) a copy of this Agreement must be included with each copy of the > > | Program. > > > Hmm, but it does not say "it must be made available _solely_ under > this Agreement". An interesting word game, but I think that a permission to relicense a work under arbitrary terms needs to be a little more explicit than this. The *only* place wher the IPL allows relicensing is this: | A Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form | under its own license agreement, provided that: which specifically does not cover redistribution of (modified or unmodified) sources. > If the licenses are compatible in the first place, What do you mean, precisely, by that? -- Henning Makholm
