At 02:50 AM 7/8/99 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The GPL would do just fine, and since he's used it on the rest of the software, >he might be disposed to grant you use of the GPL on the documentation.
I'd avoid the GPL personally for this. It's too complex and inappropriate for documentation (IMHO). You might want to check out the Open Content License (http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/) or look at what the FSF uses on their manuals (grab any GNU progam's texinfo file and take a look.) -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alternately [EMAIL PROTECTED]) "I would weep, but my tears have been stolen; I would shout, but my voice has been taken. Thus, I write." - Tragic Poet
