> > I don't plan to take any action until I am convinced that xfstt > > violates the patent.
L. Peter Deutsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is my understanding that any implementation of the TrueType > hinting machinery violates the patent, since the specification of > the hint-related "instructions" directly mirrors the claims of the > patents. If the coverage is indeed that broad, it's likely that there's prior art. Then again, without knowing the specifics, it's hard to say... [Which is to say: without knowing the specifics there's no reason to believe that there actually is a patent violation.] -- Raul
