Henning Makholm wrote: [really good answer deleted]
> > However, am I right that it doesn't exclude making a > > sold-for-profit binary-only derived product? > > Yes. If the author wants to rule out that possibility GPL will > be the canonical way to go. It will be a good choice unless one > feels bad about associating with the political language in the > GPL preamble. Thanks. That covers all my questions about the issue. Peter
