On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 09:27:41PM -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > Something odd is going on. GPL'ed programs are free (according to the DFSG), > but the GPL itself is not? > That is correct.. and known.
> I can see two possible solutions:
>
> 1. Move the entire /usr/share/common-licenses and all the non-DFSG
> /usr/{,share}/doc/*/copyright files to a non-free package.
>
> 2. (IMNSHO the best option) Add an exception to the DFSG saying that the
> license files do not need to comply with item 3 (the license file is part
> of
> the source packages after all).
Why? that's all overkill. DFSG doesn't dictate what goes into main, the
policy document does. Policy uses DFSG as the yardstick to measure a piece
of software's worthiness. Check for Policy to see if the GPL is allowed in
main.
>
>
> The usual disclaimers apply; I'm not a Debian developer, and I'm not
> subscribed
> to the lists.
>
The usual answers apply: check the list archives to find this issue
discussed...
> Note that I crossposted this message to -devel and -legal; I think the
> discussion should be carried on -legal only.
>
> --
> Cesar Eduardo Barros
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *
=========================================================================
pgp9iwyFuBKb2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
