On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 11:40:16PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > I really can't even see the point of forbidding non-free programs from > calling dpkg... either (a) they'll reimplement dpkg as non-free > software (reimplementing dpkg might be a good idea in and of itself, > but a non-free dpkg is pretty worthless to everyone, and probably a > source of confusion to boot) or (b) adopt another package manager.
Or (c) change the license on that program. And, if someone wants to re-implement dpkg, more power to them. Meanwhile, I think Ian has the right to talk to Corel about this issue. -- Raul
