On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 03:20:48PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > From: Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The first part only allows distribution for money if it's "for use offline". > > This forbids distribution for money over a network. Either makes > > it non-free. > > I think this is just like the Artistic license restriction - notice the word > "sole". It means that you can charge for more than one file, but not for this > file exclusively. I think it's sloppy, but I don't think it takes the license > out of DFSG compliance.
However, the rest of the paragraph talks about different methods of distribution, not different sets of files. I think it is reasonable to interpret the word "sole" to exclude other means of distribution, not other files. Richard Braakman
