Bruce Perens wrote: > > And in any case, whichever of obliation 2a and 2b you choose to fulfill, > > it requires notifying AT&T > > This is also in the APSL and IBM licenses. What was considered non-free > were the ones that required you to send them email on _every_ modification, > that was judged to be too great a hardship and this was the compromise.
Hm, I didn't realize that. So what if I release a program under one of these licenses, and am promptly hit and killed by a bus on the way home? You can't contact me and you haven't before, so arn't you now prohibited from modifying the software? That doesn't sound very free. -- see shy jo
