On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 09:27:21PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > OK. Well I guess if we solve this, the documentation is either > > going to fall under your main distribution or your non-free > > distribution. I think it's desirable that it fall under the free > > one so I'm prepared to compromise (a lot) to do so, including > > the abandonment of my one-web policy. :-( Tell me if the following text > > satisfies the ten commandments: > > This is great news ! > > > Copyright ? Ross N. Williams 1992,1999. All rights reserved. > > > > Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim electronic > > copies of this FunnelWeb (www.ross.net/funnelweb/) manual provided > > that all notices (including, without limitation, the copyright notice, > > this permission notice, any record of modification, and all legal > > notices) are preserved on all copies. Modified versions of this manual > > (including translations to other languages) may be distributed under > > the same terms, provided that each modification made to the manual > > since its original release by Ross N. Williams (www.ross.net) is > > identified on the page on which it occurs, and the front page of the > > manual carries a notice referring the reader to the official version > > at (www.ross.net/funnelweb/). You may print out part or all of the > > manual for individual or organization-wide internal use. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > If I use this AND provide the FunnelWeb-source-of-the-webs, would > > that enable you to include the whole lot in your main distribution? > > I think so. I guess someone on deb-legal will tell us if we missed > something.
This is not dfsg-free. I am not allowed to print a book with these docs inside and sell it. Such package wont go to main.
