On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > > > While I find licenses with patch clauses odious, they fall within the limits > > of the DFSG. > > I think not.
I mean: I think not if a patched binary may not be distributed. The fact that mirror is written in perl should be irrelevant here. There is a source and a .deb, like in every package. -- "a9258a209dd3d127d062241af99a6465" (a truly random sig)
