Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Okay for non-free pretty much only means okay to redistribute > > modified binaries (I assume we have to modify it for Debian). > > [...] > > > The third case (c) doesn't apply for an ftp site, but CDROM > > makers will care. > > Isn't it the normal situation with non-free that CD makers need to care?
They need to check each license, but there's certainly stuff in non-free that can't go on resold CDROMs. In any case, I agree with Santiago's objections to my initial reading and don't think it can go in non-free with current wording. Peter
