Anthony Towns wrote: > The counter-argument is to prevent people ripping off our work, or > something. For example, some unscrupulous dot-com could take all the > Debian stuff, setup www.debian.foo.xy in their country, and confuse > newbies into thinking that they're the official site. And everyone knows > that Debian would do *anything* to avoid confusing newbies, so this is > a completely unacceptable situation.
As you should well know, we would be well within the bounds of the DFSG to write a license that prohitied modifying the web pages and then claiming they were the debian web site. -- see shy jo, in New York
