On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:31:48AM +0100, Marc van Leeuwen wrote: > That point is: why does GPL section 3 not say something like the > following? > > For object code or other kinds of executable work, complete source code > means the full source text for all executable code that will be executed as > a direct consequence of executing the work, and whose presence on the same > computer as the work is a prerequisite for proper execution of the work; in > addition it includes any associated interface definition files, plus the > scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable.
That wouldn't work -- you've just defined the executable code as the source code. Meanwhile, I've not gotten any real feedback on whether adding -static to CFLAGS is legal, let alone any of the more complicated changes I proposed... -- Raul
