On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > He could copy and paste from > http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license > (but clause 3 of that license should be left out).
The X11 license is the closest to the "BSD license without the advertising clause" that the author seems to want. Cut and paste http://www.x.org/terms.htm, put the author's name in in place of the Open Group, and Bob's your uncle. The key advantage of the X11 license over the BSD license is that you can borrow X11-licensed code for a work covered by GPL or LGPL. A good field guide to licenses is: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html -- Don Marti Burn all GIFs: http://burnallgifs.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux rules: http://srom.zgp.org/ http://zgp.org/~dmarti You know you want this software: whois DM683 http://zgp.org/~dmarti/warez/decss.tar.gz
