I think we could put it in non-free, _if_ a maintainer was willing to go through the patch notification hassle.
The stuff that jumps out at me is all the stuff about notifying them about patches, and also paragraph 3 of GENERAL. On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 03:08:33PM +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > More information is here: > > http://www.kornshell.com/ > > http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/download/gen/ast-open.html > > Licence is here: > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/license/ast-open.html > > Does anybody know, if that licence qualifies as a Free Software licence > according to DFSG? > > P.S: I don't subscribe these lists, but I am smart enough to read > mailing list archives in WWW. If you want, you can Cc: to me. > > -- > -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * * * U of Jyväskylä * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- > -- http://www.cc.jyu.fi/~juhtolv/ * * * * " STRAIGHT BUT NOT NARROW !! " -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "I don't want to run a company. I'm not good at managing people. You have > a problem with the guy in the next cubicle? I don't care. Shoot him or > something." Marc Andreessen, founder of Netscape, in Rolling Stone, May '97 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Elie Rosenblum That is not dead which can eternal lie, http://www.cosanostra.net And with strange aeons even death may die. Admin / Mercenary / System Programmer - _The Necronomicon_
