On 04-Apr-00, 17:27 (CDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unfortunetly, it's not consistent with many of the non-DFSG-free > licenses. You'd be violating licenses if you did this with many of the > packages in non-free,
1. Non-free is not Debian. :-) 2. I'm not sure this is true. Don't we have to have the right to redistribute for a package to be in non-free? If not, how do we get away with mirroring non-free? Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)
