TOG have released Motif under an "Open Source" license which isn't. (See also /. coverage at http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/05/15/1229207 )
Quoting http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/license/: >"Open Source" programs mean software for which the source code is available >without confidential or trade secret restrictions and for which the source >code and object code are available for distribution without license charges. But on http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/ they do link to the OSD which has the real definition of "Open Source". >The rights granted under this license are limited solely to distribution >and sublicensing of the Contribution(s) on, with, or for operating systems >which are themselves Open Source programs Which puts it in the same category as Qt v1: not DFSG-free, free or Open Source. Someone feel like getting them to change their license or their terminology? Ray -- Obsig: developing a new sig
