Alan W. Irwin wrote: > When I build pine debs from debianized > source I certainly have no intention of distributing them to anyone else, > and I believe this would be true for virtually every ordinary Debian user > who built KDE debs on their machine. Especially if Debian specifically > raised the issue with them, and let them know distributing KDE binaries they > created on their machine would not be consistent with the official Debian > interpretation of the GPL.
You continue to misunderstand me. Pine is _not_ a part of Debian. By your reasoning, if KDE could be made a part of Debian in source form, pine could as well. And that is completly unacceptable. Anyhow, this is EOT as far as I am concerned. Bye! -- see shy jo
