On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 12:22:26PM -0700, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > Then we have an interesting problem. This has already been discussed > on the linux kernel list. There consensus was it is consistant and > still free. At one point, either 2.4 or 2.6, this code will be in the > kernel. Do we move the kenrel into non-free?
We might have to clip this code out of the kernels we distribute. Frankly, I think license this only needs a one word change (instead of "non-GPL", make it "non-GPLable" or "incompatible with GPL") to remove all ambiguity. However, we have every right to modify and redistribute the kernel, should we deem it necessary. -- Raul
