On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 06:10:04AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Note however, that a "you must change the name of modified versions" > > > clause is not unproblematic, > > > Do what several maintainers have already done - release under a modified > > name. (See nowebm, for example.) > > It's a possible solution from Debian's point of view. But it is not > likely to be what the author intends to achieve by using such a license.
That's *their* problem. The "you must change the name of modified versions" clause is obnoxious and impractical. -- G. Branden Robinson | Experience should teach us to be most on Debian GNU/Linux | our guard to protect liberty when the [EMAIL PROTECTED] | government's purposes are beneficent. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Louis Brandeis
pgpbb0SxL0ZhH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
