On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Henry Jones wrote: > > I argue that Debian needs to clarify > immediately with copyright holder CNRI the > licensing of Python 1.5.2--whether CNRI > considers the 1.5.2 license to be valid and > whether CNRI intends for 1.5.2 to be > distributed with that license.
I disagree. Whether CNRI thinks the license is invalid is irrelevant: the question is whether Debian thinks the license is valid. For the record, Guido has stated numerous times that BeOpen's lawyer's proffessional opinion is that the license *is* valid. -- Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There is no IGLU cabal. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
