On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 07:00:50PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > Their "logic" here is that when "this software" is copied, or > > distributed, it remains "this software" but that when it's modified, > > it is no longer "this software".
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:45:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Okay, fine. They hold copyright on "this software". They don't hold > copyright on something that isn't "this software". Modified versions > are public domain. Not what they're saying -- they say they hold the copyright on the modified versions, but they haven't issued a license for them. > Let's just yank the package. UWash is obviously more interested in > having French Deconstructionists interpret their licenses for them > than software development. That's probably as good an option as any. Maybe better. -- Raul
