On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Christian Surchi wrote: > [Please Cc: to me] > > We have at least a package (linuxfacile) in woody, under FDL (Free > Documentation License: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html). > Is that license DFSG free?
DFSG is for Software (the "S" in DFSG), so it's not an easy question... I'll let the experts to answer that. > And if it's free should we have it between > common licenses in base-files package? As soon as it becomes a "common" license, I will gladly include it in base-files. A possible definition of "common" could be this one: Whenever more than one package of standard or higher priority contains documentation licensed under FDL. In either case, I would like our Social Contract to be clarified about document licensing.
