On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:51:43PM -0600, David Starner wrote: > > No it doesn't. Permission to use, distribute, and modify are all needed > > (and provided..) This is free, though the license could use a once-over > > because of what's missing in the translation.. It's not GPL compatible, > > if that matters to you. > > What do you mean "what's missing in the translation". The translation > (assuming it was such - it could be the author wrote it in English) > seemed fine.
The author's English is not as good as his Russian, I suspect. =) > I'm not going to argue whether we have implied permission to sell it. If > the author is flexible, it would still be nice to have explicit permission > to distribute for money, IMO. I don't see an implicit permission to sell. The permission is there in the license. It says you may do those things and it gives no limitations on doing them. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3 Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 "I have a bone to pick, and a few to break." -- Anonymous
