> The question is, does the below meet the DFSG? Particularly since it > is: > 2. Requires you to give them the source (although it does say > "please" at the site listed, so "requires" may be a bit harsh).
This is ok, it essentially states what the GPL implies, you have to release the source, and thus I can take it and put it into the upstream source, making your changes moot. > 3. Requires you to give them full rights to your mods (even sell > them, from what I read). bsd / gpl allow this as well > 4. Termination clause. It terminates if you violate it, not just because they say so. > 5. Governed under Maryland law (UCITA) (although it makes sense as a > Maryland corp, but it is UCITA). This is ok, however it makes it not be GPL compatible. Usual, IANAL.
