> > There was 0zl position in their financial books for linux system > >(red-hat I think) and staroffice suite.
Probably they should not have mentioned it in their "financial books" if it is not a physical item and they didn't pay for it. I mean, do they put sunlight and gravity in their financial books, price 0zl? Now that they have mentioned it, probably they should look up the price of the CD and tell that price to the tax people so that the tax people don't have to assume that the price of GNU/Linux is the same as the price of Microsoft licences. It sounds like a simple misunderstanding to me. I'd be surprised if it can't be solved quite easily. Note: If some proprietary software company had donated software to a Polish firm, and the firm didn't provide reasonable evidence of the price, then the tax office would be quite right to make their own estimate of the price and tax accordingly, so you have to understand their point of view. Edmund
