[Gregor Hoffleit - Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:31:16 PM CST] > The license is fine and DFSG free (therefore there will a package in main > soon), the problem is clause 6, where they state "This License Agreement > shall be governed by and interpreted in all respects by the law of the State > of California, excluding conflict of law provisions." This is not compatible > with the GPL (at least according to RMS and his lawyer).
I thought that RMS's lawyers and Guido (and possibly his lawyers...) had talked over the license and were going to change it to be non-conflicting. Did that never happen, break down... or?... -- An Thi-Nguyen Le |Zounds! I was never so bethumped with words |since I first called my brother's father dad. | -- William Shakespeare, "Kind John"
