Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally, I doubt that the .dsc would be copyrightable: it doesn't > seem likely to have any novel component in and of itself.
Well, I was considering the .dsc file to be part of a copyrightable whole, not a copyrightable entity in itself. It's not worth worrying about. > Another thing that it might be sensible for Debian to do, which > I don't think has been mentioned explicitly would be to provide > the common licenses (GPL, LGPL, Artistic, MIT, BSD) on the > archive explicitly, as the FSF does with ftp.gnu.org:/gnu/GPL and > ftp.gnu.org/gnu/LGPL. ... A prudent and convenient idea. Why haven't we done this before now? - Brian
