Scripsit Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 20010207T105435+0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > I wonder, though, what happens if we take the advertising clause > > at face value: > That's not the advertising clause (fortunately) :-) What do we call it then? I've always just thought that the advertising clause came in a positive and a negative variant (which are both worse than no advertising clause with the positive one being the worst). -- Henning Makholm "What the hedgehog sang is not evidence."
