On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > [I'm probably repeating myself, but this is for the benefit of debian-legal > readers and may help to shorten discussion] > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 16:10:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > could someone please tell me if this patch: > > - contains any code with legal problems (e.g. patents)? > > Not that I'm aware of. > > > - forces the package to go to non-US? > > It doesn't. It essentially has two parts >...
Thanks for the explanations, I'll include the patch in the near future in util-linux. > will be incompatible with the current one as reported in e.g. #36939), and > there's the issue that if there were a problem, there'd be a problem with > having the diff posted to a mailing list hosted in the US and archived on > webservers hosted in the US. Ups, sorry! I'll think of this in the future before sending such a mail. > Ray cu Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
