I was looking at the license to mueller7accent-dict. The COPYRIGHT file reads:
------------------------------ (C) 1996 S.Starostin (C) 1999-2000 E.S.Cymbalyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Download: http://www.geocities.com/mueller_dic/ Copyright: This program is licensed under the GNU GPL version 2 or later, see /usr/share/common-licences/GPL on a Debian system or http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html on the web. ------------------------------ I was digging around upstream, though, and found this: ------------------------------ Copyright agreement is provided in first line of the dictionary file: (C) V.K.Mueller English-Russian Dictionary, 7 Edition; "State Publishing House of Foreign and National Dictionaries" Moscow 1961; Free Electronic Version by S.Starostin 1996 starling.rinet.ru/download/dict.exe; Electronic Version by E.S.Cymbalyuk 1999 under GNU GPL, ver. 1.2, see latest version on www.chat.ru/~mueller_dic or www.geocities.com/mueller_dic You may download original DOS-version of the Mueller dictionary (7 Edition) for DOS from www-page of Sergei Starostin. According to the extracurial compromise between company "ABBYY" and publishing house "Russky Yazyk", publishing house "Russky Yazyk" has copyrights on editions of Mueller dictionary published after 1961 only. Thus the content of Mueller dictionary published before 1961 is in public domain. S.Starostin, as the author of the first electronic version of Mueller dictionary, kindly allowed me to use his code one for any purpose. You can use my electronic version of Mueller dictionary under GNU GPL. The Russian Scientific-Technical Center "Informregistr" has registered the Electronic Version of Mueller Dictionary (7 Edition) on February 29, 2000. The number of State registration is 0320000030. ------------------------------ This should be in the copyright file, right? More worrysome to me, though, is why is this in the public domain? Under Berne convention copyright law, Mueller or ABBYY or Russky Yazyk would still have copyright, unless it was deliberately given up. Does the registry number tell us anything about the copyright status? (I may be going a little paranoid here, but this upstream isn't careful in dealing with copyright issues, and the description sounds a little suspicious. What does extracurial mean, and what did he mean it to mean, anyway?) -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org "I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
