Hi, On Sat, 5 May 2001, Sam TH wrote:
> > * It includes and statically links sha2.c from > > http://www.aarongifford.com/computers/sha.html, which is BSD licensed > > (without advertising clause). I think they are compatible but I'm not > > sure. > > This is fine. And which license and copyright holders must the debian/copyright file mention: the GPL, BSD or both? > > > > > * It copies sources blowfish.c, and rijndael.c from gnupg (also GPL) which > > have been lightly modified to remove some unneeded funtions and some > > datatypes. The problem is that the author has replaced the Copyright > > holder notice with it's own. > > > > Including the files is fine. Changing the copyright notice is not. > At a minimum, the copyright of the original author must also be > mentioned. > The original authors are mentioned at the end of the copyriht notice (at least a pointer to http://www.gnupg.org is given), so I suppose this is fine. > > Also I'm not sure wheter the cyphering algorithms blowfish and > > rijndael (aes) force the program to go to non-US or it can be put into > > main. > > It needs to go into nonus, barring a change in policy on crypto. > > > sam th --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/ Thanks, Carlos.
