On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:34:02PM -0500, Fred Gray wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:24:46PM -0500, Sam TH wrote: > > > > This certainly looks both DFSG-free and GPL-compatible. The use of > > the word 'and' rather than 'or' seems to take care of the Pine problem > > > > Quoting from the Pine FAQ > (http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/legal.html#10.2): > > In particular, the earliest Pine licenses included the words: "Permission > to > use, copy, modify, and distribute this software... is hereby granted," but > some people tried to pervert the meaning of that sentence to define "this > software" to include derivative works of "this software". > > So, apparently the Pine license also used the word "and." Hmmph.
I think that's a bullshit license interpretation. The terms of a
non-negotiated license are construed against the drafter. All the
same, you might want to get a clarification for your license.
sam th --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC --- http://samth.dyndns.org/key
DeCSS: http://samth.dyndns.org/decss
pgphOQIkGGzFL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
