Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> This is because a project containing code under both licenses would impose
> both sets of license restrictions on people. The GPL, however, is not
> miscible with license that impose any more restrictions than it does
> itself.
>
> Thus, the old BSD license is not compatible with the GPL.
Thanks for this explanation, I have been quite unclear on how it was
incompatible..
> Note that all code with the old BSD license and copyrighted by the Regents
> of the University of California, has been categorically relicensed with the
> old clause 3 removed.
Yes, this leaves third party people who have created a derivative license
with replacing the name of copyright holders.
thanks,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d+ s:- a-- C+ UL++++ P- L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w++
O- M- V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t-- 5 X-- R* tv- b+ DI- D++
G e h* r% !y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
