On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 11:33:31PM -0400, none wrote: > My difficulty with this argument is that an owner of the copy of the > GPL library has a wide right to make a derivative work on the owner's > computer by virtue of the GPL and/or a more limited right in the U.S. > by virtue of section 117 of the U.S. Copyright Act. If the end-user is > licensed how is there infringement, whether direct, contributory or > vicarious?
Excuse me? I thought you held the position that writing advertising could potentially violate the old BSD copyright. This advertising is NOT a derivative work of the BSD licensed software. How can you hold this position and imagine that being a derivative work somehow must be less restrictive? -- Raul
