John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Basically, this whole part of the > argument is a large no-op, and really shouldn't have been brought up in > the first place unless you think it's time to consider the copyright on > licenses as a valid thing in determining the DFSG-freeness or worth of > inclusion in Debian of the program covered, in which case I say "cry havoc > and loose the dogs of war".
Agreed. The GPL, for example, says: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. But we don't consider GPL programs that include a copy of the GPL as non-free. So let's just stop talking about the copyright of licences. Edmund
