-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This means we can't distribute the tomcat deb, until such changes are > relicensed. It also means that if the tomcat maintainer has accepted patches > on behalf of tomcat, he needs to check with the original patch submitters, as > the license of those patches is in question(are they under Apache, or GPL?). No.. this is not true. The both the Apache/BSD and GPL licenses are both Free Software licenses. What makes them incompatible is if you want to link Apache code into GPL code (which the tomcat.deb would obviously not be doing. BTW... This should end this discussion :) The site www.fsf.org is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) Debian/GNU on Linux. http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?mode_u=off&mode_w=on&site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsf.org&submit=Examine If the FSF site is running Debian/GNU linux with BSD software I don't see any problem... Kevin - -- Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Cell: 415-595-9965 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596 Live life as if you were going to die tomorrow; Learn as if you were going to live forever. -- Mahatma Ghandi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt iD8DBQE7vFaWAwM6xb2dfE0RAgK9AKCEGbr4a5pHlgoxrlyYqZKmhRhA1wCffEgV +qEc18GWxxriJPc43KFgtP4= =qcxz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
