On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:11:13PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have. Try the "Choral Public Domain License" > > (http://cpdl.snaptel.com/license.htm), which is essentially the GPL with > > "software" replaced by "music". Was constructing that licence a > > copyright infringement? > > Perhaps, but the FSF is not obligated to pursue it, are they?
Of course not, but I find it curious. I'm sure I've mentioned that licence (in another context) to at least one FSF person who didn't immediately say it was a bad idea, too. Perhaps the notice at the top of the GPL could have been better thought out. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
