Sunnanvind Fenderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The shorter and informal one that Thomas posted would probably > suffice, but I feel we can't do totally without one - it should at > least be stated somewhere, sometime that Debian *can* distribute > license texts and invariant, auxiliary material. Hitherto, this has > not been explicitly stated, so technically (to the point of absurdity) > we'd have to put all GPL software in contrib and the GPL license text > itself in non-free. That's silly, so we should actually say somewhere > what's excepted from DFSG 3. Informal or formal, either would do.
Or, we could point out that it's the Debian Free *Software* Guidelines, not the Debian free-everything-in-the-world guidelines. I
