Henning Makholm said: > I think I would be satisfied if we added something like > > 3) If a copyright holder withholds permission to modify or remove > other texts of a non-technical nature, the merits of including > the work in Debian must be considered on a case-by-case basis. > As a general rule, such works should not be included simply because > someone wants to package them, but only when a compelling argument > can be made that it would significantly impair Debian's value as > a free operating system if the work was left out.
This is what non-free is for, right? How is including the emacs docs "cuz we need it" different from including netscape back whene there weren't any free alternatives? -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03
