Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Including the GPL actually makes it a lot more complicated. It's hard > to read and even harder to understand. How often does RMS have to > correct wrong ideas about the GPL? It's not so clear what the GPL > really means. I can't say I fully understand it.
But why do you think your license is going to evade this problem? I think, measured against lines of code, the vim license has garnered vastly more confusion, discussion, correction of wrong ideas, etc.
