"C.M. Connelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the meantime, should we drop the possibly problematic files > from our packages, or can we continue distributing them on the > basis that we have been distributing them without problems thus > far, and that CTAN continues to include them in their ``free'' > section? (Files that are egregiously non-DFSG-free will, of > course, be dropped.)
Now that you've posted, we can't claim ignorance. :) I'll clarify my thoughts about each of the licenses in separate messages (with changed subjects, to hopefully keep it clearer).
