On 13 Apr 2002, Henning Makholm wrote: > The more difficult problem is the legal status of each individual game > itself? Do the chess players who played it have a sort of copyright? > Surely, they have made real intellectual decisions about which piece > to move where, but is that a decision about content (which is not > protected by copyright) or form (which is)?
OK, I felt also uneasy about this. I googled around and found the following quotes: http://www.bcmchess.co.uk/britbase/about.htm Legally the actual moves of any game as played are considered to be in the public domain and not subject to any copyright laws. "The Week In Chess" by Mark Crowther (the more or less definitive weekly internet publication on chess) contains some reports (see issues http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/twic{201,204,205,217,275}.html, grep for "copyright") on an initiative of FIDE to enforce copyright on raw game scores. However, it seems they failed, and it seems that Bobby Fischer already tried this once and failed, too. Here is another find from the usenet: Message-ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> contains the following statements by Dr. Roy Schmidt from Hong Kong University. The game score, in an of itself, cannot be copyrighted. It is simply a record of a public event. [...] The publisher holds a copyright on the *collection*. The rationale is that the publisher has applied some unique criteria to select the games in the collection. He continues to talk about annotations which may be subject to copyright. However, the gnuchess book consists of raw game scores, so my conclusion is that it is not subject to copyright and it is in the public domain. (As far as I know, the gnuchess book was not put together with some "unique criteria", was it, Simon?) Any objections? Lukas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
